FSA Fines BlackRock Investment Management £9.5m for Client Money Breaches

Jack Humphrey, Regulatory journalist
September 13, 2012 /

The Financial Services Authority (FSA) has fined BlackRock Investment Management (UK) Limited (BIM) £9,533,100 for failing to protect client money adequately by not putting trust letters in place for certain money market deposits, and for failing to take reasonable care to organise and control its affairs responsibly in relation to the identification and protection of client money.

The FSA’s client money rules are designed to protect client money in the event of a firm’s insolvency. A firm must have a trust letter from any bank holding its client money to ensure that, in the event of the firm’s insolvency, client money is clearly identifiable and is ring-fenced from the firm’s own assets so that it can be promptly returned.

Between 1 October 2006 and 31 March 2010, BIM failed to obtain such letters in relation to some of the money market deposits it placed with third party banks. The error occurred as a result of systems changes that followed on from BlackRock group’s acquisition of BIM, which had previously been known as Merrill Lynch Investment Managers Limited.

These changes rendered BIM’s procedures for setting up trust letters ineffective. The average daily balance affected by this failure was over £1.36 billion. Had the firm become insolvent at any time during this period, clients would have suffered delay in securing the return of their funds and may not have recovered their money in full.

Tracey McDermott, FSA director of enforcement and financial crime, said: “Identifying and protecting client money should be at the top of every firm’s agenda. We have repeatedly emphasised to firms that their systems and controls for ensuring this is the case must be robust and well designed and updated as circumstances change. Despite being part of one of the largest asset managers in the world, BIM’s systems were simply not adequate, and the basic step of notifying banks that the money was held on trust for clients was not done.

“This is not the first time we have seen the impact on client money overlooked as part of a re-organisation. The fine imposed today should remind all firms of the critical importance we place on ensuring proper protection of client money at all times.”

In determining the penalty the FSA took into account that the misconduct was not deliberate, and that the firm reported the issue to the FSA and has since remedied the situation and put in place robust systems and controls relating to client money protection.

No clients suffered any losses as a result of the error. The firm agreed to settle with the FSA at an early stage. In doing so it qualified for a 30% discount on the financial penalty. Had it not been for this discount the penalty would have been £13,618,800.


Share your opinion

SEO Powered By SEOPressor