FASB Wants Balanced Benefits for Financial Statement Users at Low Cost for Preparers
The Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) is proposing to improve the presentation for reclassifications out of accumulated other comprehensive income in a bid to balance the benefits to financial statements users while curbing the costs for preparers.
The proposed amendments would apply to all public and private organizations, but not to non-profit organizations. Stakeholders are asked to provide input by October 15, 2012.
Other comprehensive income includes gains and losses that are initially excluded from net income for an accounting period. Those gains and losses are later reclassified out of accumulated other comprehensive income into net income.
The proposed accounting standards would require a tabular disclosure about reclassifications out of accumulated other comprehensive income, thereby presenting, in one place, information about the amounts reclassified and a road map to related financial disclosures.
Currently, this information is presented throughout the financial statements under U.S. Generally Accepted Accounting Principles. As a result, there should not be significant costs incurred by preparers of financial statements, FASB said.
In December 2011, the FASB issued an accounting update that deferred only those changes required by ASU No. 2011-05, Comprehensive Income (Topic 220): Presentation of Comprehensive Income (issued in July 2011), related to reclassifications, so that the FASB could further evaluate the cost/benefit of the requirements.
The amendments in its newly proposed update provide alternative presentation requirements on how to present reclassifications out of accumulated other comprehensive income to the requirements in Update 2011-05, which were deferred in Update 2011-12.
“Stakeholders raised concerns that certain requirements about the reclassification of items out of accumulated other comprehensive income would be costly for preparers and add unnecessary complexity to financial statements,” said FASB Chairman Leslie F. Seidman. “Based on this new feedback, the Board is proposing a revised approach that will present information about other comprehensive information in a useful way that is more cost-effective.”
The FASB has not yet decided on an effective date but plans to do so after seeking stakeholder comments.